Sprowles, in the matter of Cornerstone Investment Aust Pty Ltd (in liq) [2022] FCA 1008
The Court was satisfied, having regard to Mr Hogan's affidavit and the Leigh factors, that approval should be given for the plaintiffs to enter into the funding agreement. To the extent the funding agreement provided an advantage to the Department and, by extension, the Commission, leave should be granted under s 80-55(5) having regard to the circumstances attending, and the need for, the funding agreement. The commercially sensitive information in the filed material justified limiting access pending conclusion of the Supreme Court proceedings and any appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application by Liquidators for Approval to Enter Into a Litigation Funding Agreement and Related Leave and Non Publication Orders / Interlocutory Process Dated 26 August 2022; Orders Made 29 August 2022
- Outcome
- Orders made granting confidentiality relief, joining Cornerstone as second plaintiff, approving the funding agreement nunc pro tunc, granting leave under s 80-55(5)(b) to the extent required, and making costs costs in the liquidation.
- Legal Topics
- ["liquidators' Powers" 'litigation Funding Agreement' 'committee of Inspection' 'conflict of Interest' 'non Publication Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application by Liquidators for Approval to Enter Into a Litigation Funding Agreement and Related Leave and Non Publication Orders / Interlocutory Process Dated 26 August 2022; Orders Made 29 August 2022
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether approval should be given under ss 477(2B) and 506(1A) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for the liquidators to enter into the funding agreement.' 'Whether leave should be granted under s 80-55(5) of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) for the committee of inspection to derive any profit or advantage by virtue of Cornerstone entering into the funding agreement.' 'Whether an order should be made under s 37AF(1)(b) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) limiting access to documents on the Court file.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied, having regard to Mr Hogan's affidavit and the Leigh factors, that approval should be given for the plaintiffs to enter into the funding agreement. To the extent the funding agreement provided an advantage to the Department and, by extension, the Commission, leave should be granted under s 80-55(5) having regard to the circumstances attending, and the need for, the funding agreement. The commercially sensitive information in the filed material justified limiting access pending conclusion of the Supreme Court proceedings and any appeal.
Court Disposition
Orders made granting confidentiality relief, joining Cornerstone as second plaintiff, approving the funding agreement nunc pro tunc, granting leave under s 80-55(5)(b) to the extent required, and making costs costs in the liquidation.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 37AF(1)(b) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), access to specified documents on the Court file not be granted, and the transcript not otherwise be disclosed or provided, except as ordered by the Court, until proceeding no 2021/150771 in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, including...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment