In the matter of Alphena Pty Limited (in liquidation) [2012] NSWSC 536
Approval is granted for the liquidator to enter into an agreement (without an uplift fee provision) because court approval is required under s 477(2B) and the agreement may be discharged by performance more than three months after its entry.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Matter / Application for Court Approval of Liquidator's Agreement
- Outcome
- Approval granted for entry into agreement by liquidator without uplift provision.
- Legal Topics
- ["liquidator's Powers" 'approval of Agreements' 'conditional Costs Agreements' 'uplift Fees']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Matter / Application for Court Approval of Liquidator's Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether court approval should be granted for liquidator to enter into a retainer agreement with solicitors' 'Whether the retainer agreement constitutes a conditional costs agreement contrary to the Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
Approval is granted for the liquidator to enter into an agreement (without an uplift fee provision) because court approval is required under s 477(2B) and the agreement may be discharged by performance more than three months after its entry.
Court Disposition
Approval granted for entry into agreement by liquidator without uplift provision.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), approval is granted for the entry into by the first plaintiff as liquidator of the second plaintiff an agreement in the form which is part of exhibit B to the affidavit of Charly Tannous sworn 23 March 2012.' "Subject to any further order of the Court, the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment