Elkerton (Liquidator) v IBN Global Pty Ltd, in the matter of Ji Woo International Education Centre Pty Ltd (in liq) [2019] FCA 2098
Approval was granted because the funding agreement allows the liquidator to pursue valuable and meritorious claims, on reasonable terms, with no indication of impropriety or lack of good faith, and confidentiality was warranted to protect the commercial sensitivity of certain documents.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Ji Woo International Education Centre Pty Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 105 435 201); Second Plaintiff: Anthony Elkerton (in his capacity as liquidator of Ji Woo International Education Centre Pty Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 105 435 201)); First Defendant: IBN Global Pty Ltd (ACN 166 098 157); Second Defendant: Bo Hyun Lee (aka Scott Lee); Third Defendant: Chihoon Choi; Fourth Defendant: Hye Young Han
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations – Ex Parte Application by Liquidator for Approval of Agreement / Approval Application Determination
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator's Powers, Litigation Funding Agreement, Approval Under S 477(2 B) Corporations Act, Confidentiality Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ji Woo International Education Centre Pty Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 105 435 201)
First Plaintiff
Anthony Elkerton (in his capacity as liquidator of Ji Woo International Education Centre Pty Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 105 435 201))
Second Plaintiff
IBN Global Pty Ltd (ACN 166 098 157)
First Defendant
Bo Hyun Lee (aka Scott Lee)
Second Defendant
Chihoon Choi
Third Defendant
Hye Young Han
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Corporations – Ex Parte Application by Liquidator for Approval of Agreement / Approval Application Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Should approval be given under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for the liquidator to enter into a litigation funding agreement and a retainer for legal representation?
- 2 Should confidentiality orders be made under s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)?
Ratio Decidendi
Approval was granted because the funding agreement allows the liquidator to pursue valuable and meritorious claims, on reasonable terms, with no indication of impropriety or lack of good faith, and confidentiality was warranted to protect the commercial sensitivity of certain documents.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Second plaintiff authorised to enter into the funding agreement as Confidential Exhibit A under s 477(2B) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- Second plaintiff authorised to enter into a retainer with Neville Hourn & Borg Legal Pty Ltd as legal representatives for the plaintiffs upon terms of the funding agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment