In the matter of Dungowan Manly Pty Limited (in liquidation) [2017] NSWSC 1771
The Court held the liquidators should not take steps to cause the company to cancel its shares on issue, as this would contravene s 114 of the Corporations Act by leaving the company with no members, and such a transaction could not be validated as it would prejudice creditors. Instead, and subject to resolving commercial issues regarding funding enforcement, the Court indicated that the liquidators could be granted leave to appoint themselves as joint and several administrators, who would then be justified in issuing a further levy to shareholders to discharge outstanding creditor debts, including those owed to Mr and Mrs McLaughlin.
- Parties
- First Applicants: Simon John Cathro and Christopher Damien Darin as joint and several liquidators of Dungowan Manly Pty Limited (in liquidation); Second Applicant: Dungowan Manly Pty Limited (in liquidation); Interested Parties: P D and J McLaughlin (Interested Parties)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations – Winding Up – Application for Directions / Interlocutory (application for Directions in Liquidation)
- Outcome
- Application adjourned for further consideration; no direction to cancel shares; indication that subject to funding, liquidators could be granted leave to appoint themselves as administrators and issue further levy.
- Legal Topics
- Liquidators' Powers and Obligations, Winding Up of Companies, Share Cancellation, Levy on Shareholders, Court Directions to Liquidators
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon John Cathro and Christopher Damien Darin as joint and several liquidators of Dungowan Manly Pty Limited (in liquidation)
First Applicants
Dungowan Manly Pty Limited (in liquidation)
Second Applicant
P D and J McLaughlin (Interested Parties)
Interested Parties
Procedural Posture
Corporations – Winding Up – Application for Directions / Interlocutory (application for Directions in Liquidation)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether liquidators should cause the company to cancel its shares on issue
- 2 Whether liquidators are justified in causing the company to issue a further levy to its shareholders
- 3 Whether liquidators should be permitted to appoint themselves as administrators to enable levy issue
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held the liquidators should not take steps to cause the company to cancel its shares on issue, as this would contravene s 114 of the Corporations Act by leaving the company with no members, and such a transaction could not be validated as it would prejudice creditors. Instead, and subject to resolving commercial issues regarding funding enforcement, the Court indicated that the liquidators could be granted leave to appoint themselves as joint and several administrators, who would then be justified in issuing a further levy to shareholders to discharge outstanding creditor debts, including those owed to Mr and Mrs McLaughlin.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned for further consideration; no direction to cancel shares; indication that subject to funding, liquidators could be granted leave to appoint themselves as administrators and issue further levy.
Orders
- No direction is made that the liquidators take steps to cancel the shares on issue.
- A direction could be made (subject to commercial consideration) that liquidators, as appointed administrators, may issue a further levy to shareholders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment