White, in the matter of Macro Realty Developments Pty Ltd and Macro Realty Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1377
It was not practicable for the liquidators to convene a meeting of creditors to approve the remuneration, given the number, location, and characteristics of the creditors, and the potential costs and obstacles involved. Sufficient evidence of work, itemised remuneration, and notice to affected parties had been provided, with no objections received. The remuneration claimed was fair and reasonable. The orders approving and fixing the remuneration as sought were granted, and relief from compliance with the relevant procedural rules was also justified.
- Parties
- First Applicants: Hayden Leigh White and Matthew David Woods in their capacity as joint and several provisional liquidators of Macro Realty Developments Pty Ltd (in liquidation) and Macro Realty Pty Ltd (in liquidation); Second Applicants: Hayden Leigh White and Matthew David Woods in their capacity as joint and several liquidators of Macro Realty Developments Pty Ltd (in liquidation) and Macro Realty Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Approval of Liquidators' Remuneration / Judgment on Remuneration Application
- Outcome
- Orders granting the determination and fixing of the applicants' remuneration; applicants excused from convening a meeting of creditors; compliance with procedural rules excused; costs in the winding up.
- Legal Topics
- Liquidators' Remuneration, Provisional Liquidation, Assessment of Remuneration, Meetings of Creditors, Practical Impossibility Exception, Notice and Service Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hayden Leigh White and Matthew David Woods in their capacity as joint and several provisional liquidators of Macro Realty Developments Pty Ltd (in liquidation) and Macro Realty Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
First Applicants
Hayden Leigh White and Matthew David Woods in their capacity as joint and several liquidators of Macro Realty Developments Pty Ltd (in liquidation) and Macro Realty Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
Second Applicants
Procedural Posture
Application for Approval of Liquidators' Remuneration / Judgment on Remuneration Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the remuneration claimed by the provisional liquidators and liquidators is fair and reasonable under s 473(2)-(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the applicants should be excused from convening a meeting of creditors to determine remuneration due to impracticability
- 3 Whether notice and service requirements for the remuneration applications were complied with
Ratio Decidendi
It was not practicable for the liquidators to convene a meeting of creditors to approve the remuneration, given the number, location, and characteristics of the creditors, and the potential costs and obstacles involved. Sufficient evidence of work, itemised remuneration, and notice to affected parties had been provided, with no objections received. The remuneration claimed was fair and reasonable. The orders approving and fixing the remuneration as sought were granted, and relief from compliance with the relevant procedural rules was also justified.
Court Disposition
Orders granting the determination and fixing of the applicants' remuneration; applicants excused from convening a meeting of creditors; compliance with procedural rules excused; costs in the winding up.
Orders
- Remuneration of $122,470.00 (plus GST) to the First Applicants as provisional liquidators of Macro Realty Developments Pty Ltd (for the period 14 March 2017 to 30 May 2017) fixed and approved.
- Remuneration of $54,762.50 (plus GST) to the First Applicants as provisional liquidators of Macro Realty Pty Ltd (for the period 14 March 2017 to 30 May 2017) fixed and approved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment