Lemonjian v Nelson [2001] NSWSC 464

Lemonjian v Nelson [2001] NSWSC 464

The $30,000 given by the plaintiff to the defendant was a loan made in the context of the relationship and is repayable, as it was not a gift. Damages for assault are justified by the plaintiff's reasonable apprehension of harm. Damages for conversion or damage to goods are awarded on the basis of available estimates, and no aggravated or exemplary damages are awarded as the conduct arose out of a personal relationship breakdown and no consequential economic loss was established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil (equity) / Final Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for repayment of loan and for damages for assault and some damaged property succeeds in part. Cross-claimant obtains judgment for limited damages for property damage. Costs variously apportioned.
Legal Topics
['loan Recovery' 'assault' 'conversion' 'damages for Chattels' 'exemplary Damages']
['equity' 'torts' 'damages'] ['loan Recovery' 'assault' 'conversion' 'damages for Chattels' 'exemplary Damages']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil (equity) / Final Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the $30,000 given to the defendant was a loan or gift and if repayment is due' 'Whether assault occurred and appropriate measure of damages' "Whether either party converted or damaged the other's goods and quantum of damages" 'Whether aggravated or exemplary damages should be awarded']

Ratio Decidendi

The $30,000 given by the plaintiff to the defendant was a loan made in the context of the relationship and is repayable, as it was not a gift. Damages for assault are justified by the plaintiff's reasonable apprehension of harm. Damages for conversion or damage to goods are awarded on the basis of available estimates, and no aggravated or exemplary damages are awarded as the conduct arose out of a personal relationship breakdown and no consequential economic loss was established.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for repayment of loan and for damages for assault and some damaged property succeeds in part. Cross-claimant obtains judgment for limited damages for property damage. Costs variously apportioned.

Orders

  • ['The defendant pay to the plaintiff $30,000 together with interest from 13 July 2000 to date at the rate fixed by Schedule J to the Supreme Court Rules.' 'Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $2,250.00.' 'No order as to costs reserved on 1 August and 22 August 2000.' "Defendant to pay...