In the matter of Westfield Holdings Limited & ors; Application of RE1 Limited (ABN 80 145 743 862) and RE2 Limited as responsible entities for Westfield Retail Trust 1 and Westfield Retail Trust 2 (No 5) [2014] NSWSC 976
The Court was satisfied that all legal and procedural requirements were met, including those advised in earlier hearings; the requisite majority of security holders approved the resolutions; no unfairness to minority interests was established; and thus the schemes were approved.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Westfield Holdings Limited; Second Plaintiff: Westfield Management Limited as responsible entity of the Westfield Trust; Third Plaintiff: Westfield America Management Limited as responsible entity of the Westfield America Trust; First Plaintiff: RE1 Limited as responsible entity for Westfield Retail Trust 1; Second Plaintiff: RE2 Limited as responsible entity for Westfield Retail Trust 2
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Advice / Schemes of Arrangement Approval / Second Hearing (final Approval)
- Outcome
- Schemes approved
- Legal Topics
- Managed Investments, Schemes of Arrangement, Responsible Entity Judicial Advice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Westfield Holdings Limited
First Plaintiff
Westfield Management Limited as responsible entity of the Westfield Trust
Second Plaintiff
Westfield America Management Limited as responsible entity of the Westfield America Trust
Third Plaintiff
RE1 Limited as responsible entity for Westfield Retail Trust 1
First Plaintiff
RE2 Limited as responsible entity for Westfield Retail Trust 2
Second Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Advice / Schemes of Arrangement Approval / Second Hearing (final Approval)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the formal legal and procedural requirements for approval of the trust schemes have been met
- 2 Whether the proposal could legitimately be approved by security holders acting reasonably in their own interests
- 3 Whether minority interests are dealt with fairly
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that all legal and procedural requirements were met, including those advised in earlier hearings; the requisite majority of security holders approved the resolutions; no unfairness to minority interests was established; and thus the schemes were approved.
Court Disposition
Schemes approved
Orders
- Orders approving the Westfield schemes made in accordance with the documents entitled 'Order dated 23 June 2014' and 'Order' signed and sealed by the Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment