In the matter of Irongate Funds Management Limited as responsible entity for Irongate Property Fund I and Irongate Property Fund II [2022] NSWSC 723
Judicial advice was appropriately given that the responsible entity of Irongate Property Fund I and II is justified in convening meetings and propounding resolutions to implement the proposed trust schemes and in proceeding as the constitutional amendments are within the conferral of alteration powers in the constitutions and s 601GC Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), with no discretionary reason to withhold advice based on the evidence and accepted scheme protections.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Irongate Funds Management Limited as responsible entity for Irongate Property Fund I; Second Plaintiff: Irongate Funds Management Limited as responsible entity for Irongate Property Fund II; Bidder: Charter Hall Wholesale Management Ltd as trustee of the Charter Hall PGGM Industrial Partnership No 2; Bidder: Charter Hall Holdings Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Advice (managed Investments Trust Scheme) / First Hearing; Orders Made on 19 May 2022 With Reasons Published 2 June 2022
- Outcome
- Judicial advice given – responsible entity justified in propounding resolutions and proposed constitutional amendments for trust scheme implementation.
- Legal Topics
- Managed Investment Schemes, Judicial Advice to Trustees, Trust Schemes of Arrangement, Constitutional Amendments, Collateral Benefits, Break Fees, Exclusivity Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Irongate Funds Management Limited as responsible entity for Irongate Property Fund I
First Plaintiff
Irongate Funds Management Limited as responsible entity for Irongate Property Fund II
Second Plaintiff
Charter Hall Wholesale Management Ltd as trustee of the Charter Hall PGGM Industrial Partnership No 2
Bidder
Charter Hall Holdings Pty Ltd
Bidder
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Advice (managed Investments Trust Scheme) / First Hearing; Orders Made on 19 May 2022 With Reasons Published 2 June 2022
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the responsible entity is justified in convening meetings and propounding resolutions to implement the proposed trust schemes
- 2 Whether proposed amendments are within the constitutional powers of alteration and s 601GC of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 3 Issues regarding break fees, exclusivity, collateral benefits, class voting, and foreign law application
Ratio Decidendi
Judicial advice was appropriately given that the responsible entity of Irongate Property Fund I and II is justified in convening meetings and propounding resolutions to implement the proposed trust schemes and in proceeding as the constitutional amendments are within the conferral of alteration powers in the constitutions and s 601GC Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), with no discretionary reason to withhold advice based on the evidence and accepted scheme protections.
Court Disposition
Judicial advice given – responsible entity justified in propounding resolutions and proposed constitutional amendments for trust scheme implementation.
Orders
- Judicial advice given under s 63 Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) that responsible entity is justified in convening meetings and propounding resolutions to implement the proposed trust schemes.
- Responsible entity justified in proceeding on the basis that constitutional amendments to implement the trust scheme are within powers of alteration and s 601GC Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment