R v Rees [2012] NSWSC 922

R v Rees [2012] NSWSC 922

A total sentence of 5 years with a non-parole period of 3 years and 2 months was appropriate because the offence was the unlawful killing of a vulnerable infant by her mother in a position of trust, but the offender's responsibility was significantly diminished by a severe adjustment disorder and abnormality of mind that substantially impaired her understanding, judgment and self-control. The court also gave weight to her prior exemplary care of the child, lack of prior convictions, remorse, offer and pleas to manslaughter, admissions, time already served, good prospects of rehabilitation, and the desirability of extended parole supervision.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 August 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Manslaughter / Sentencing After Jury Verdict of Not Guilty of Murder But Guilty of Manslaughter
Outcome
Danielle Rees was sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 5 years, with a non-parole period of 3 years and 2 months and a balance term of 1 year and 10 months.
Legal Topics
['manslaughter' 'child Victim' 'substantial Impairment' 'mitigating Factors' 'aggravating Factors' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['manslaughter' 'child Victim' 'substantial Impairment' 'mitigating Factors' 'aggravating Factors' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence for Manslaughter / Sentencing After Jury Verdict of Not Guilty of Murder But Guilty of Manslaughter

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for the manslaughter of a 17-month-old child.' "Whether the offender's abnormality of mind and substantially impaired capacities significantly reduced her moral culpability." 'What weight should be given to mitigation including remorse, absence of prior convictions, offer to plead guilty, admissions, time in custody and prospects of rehabilitation.' "What weight should be given to aggravating factors including the vulnerability of the child and the offender's position of trust as mother." 'Whether special circumstances justified varying the relationship between the non-parole period and balance of term to allow extended supervision on parole.']

Ratio Decidendi

A total sentence of 5 years with a non-parole period of 3 years and 2 months was appropriate because the offence was the unlawful killing of a vulnerable infant by her mother in a position of trust, but the offender's responsibility was significantly diminished by a severe adjustment disorder and abnormality of mind that substantially impaired her understanding, judgment and self-control. The court also gave weight to her prior exemplary care of the child, lack of prior convictions, remorse, offer and pleas to manslaughter, admissions, time already served, good prospects of rehabilitation, and the desirability of extended parole supervision.

Court Disposition

Danielle Rees was sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 5 years, with a non-parole period of 3 years and 2 months and a balance term of 1 year and 10 months.

Orders

  • ['Danielle Rees is sentenced to imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 3 years and 2 months commencing on 10 August 2009 and expiring on 9 October 2012 with a balance term of 1 year and 10 months commencing on 10 October 2012.' 'The total term is 5 years.' 'The earliest date of eligibility for parole is...