R v Allan [2021] NSWDC 560
The offender was criminally responsible for manslaughter on the basis of excessive self-defence because, although he believed it was necessary to defend himself, it was not reasonable in the circumstances as he perceived them to stab Mr Oldfield in the chest after he had disarmed him. The offence was below midrange but not at or toward the bottom of the range, with no additional aggravating factors. Taking account of the offender's subjective circumstances, criminal history, genuine remorse, early guilty plea and the continuing relevance of deterrence and rehabilitation, only full-time imprisonment was appropriate, with no variation of the statutory ratio.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Plea of Guilty
- Outcome
- Term of imprisonment of 3 years 6 months with a non-parole period of 2 years 7 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['manslaughter' 'excessive Self Defence' 'guilty Plea' 'objective Seriousness' 'remorse' 'general Deterrence' 'specific Deterrence' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Plea of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for manslaughter on the basis of excessive self-defence.' 'Whether the offender was genuinely remorseful despite not giving evidence directly in the sentence proceedings.' 'Whether the statutory ratio should be varied to facilitate rehabilitation.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender was criminally responsible for manslaughter on the basis of excessive self-defence because, although he believed it was necessary to defend himself, it was not reasonable in the circumstances as he perceived them to stab Mr Oldfield in the chest after he had disarmed him. The offence was below midrange but not at or toward the bottom of the range, with no additional aggravating factors. Taking account of the offender's subjective circumstances, criminal history, genuine remorse, early guilty plea and the continuing relevance of deterrence and rehabilitation, only full-time imprisonment was appropriate, with no variation of the statutory ratio.
Court Disposition
Term of imprisonment of 3 years 6 months with a non-parole period of 2 years 7 months.
Orders
- ['The sentence is backdated to commence on 13 January 2020, the date of arrest.' 'The term of the sentence is 3 years and 6 months after a 25% discount for the guilty plea.' 'The non-parole period is 2 years and 7 months dating from 13 January 2020 and expiring on 12 August 2022.' 'The balance of the term is 11...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment