Regina v Waterman [2002] NSWSC 1236

Regina v Waterman [2002] NSWSC 1236

Because the Court was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the fatal wound resulted from a deliberate stabbing, sentence was imposed on the basis that the deceased impaled himself while the offender menaced him with a knife. Although the offence fell short of the more serious category of this class of manslaughter, it remained serious because the offender armed himself with a knife in anticipation of violence and kicked the victim afterwards. Balancing objective gravity with favourable subjective matters, including remorse, an earlier offer to plead guilty to manslaughter, family support and good rehabilitation prospects, justified a sentence of six years with a non-parole period of...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 December 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Sentence After Jury Verdict of Guilty of Manslaughter
Outcome
The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for six years with a non-parole period of three and a half years.
Legal Topics
['manslaughter' 'unlawful and Dangerous Act' 'objective Gravity' 'subjective Circumstances' 'remorse' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['manslaughter' 'unlawful and Dangerous Act' 'objective Gravity' 'subjective Circumstances' 'remorse' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Sentence After Jury Verdict of Guilty of Manslaughter

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the offender should be sentenced on the basis of a deliberate stabbing or on the basis that the deceased lunged towards the knife and impaled himself upon it.' "What sentence and non-parole period were appropriate for manslaughter in light of the offence circumstances, the offender's intoxication, criminal history, remorse, rehabilitation prospects and offer to plead guilty to manslaughter."]

Ratio Decidendi

Because the Court was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the fatal wound resulted from a deliberate stabbing, sentence was imposed on the basis that the deceased impaled himself while the offender menaced him with a knife. Although the offence fell short of the more serious category of this class of manslaughter, it remained serious because the offender armed himself with a knife in anticipation of violence and kicked the victim afterwards. Balancing objective gravity with favourable subjective matters, including remorse, an earlier offer to plead guilty to manslaughter, family support and good rehabilitation prospects, justified a sentence of six years with a non-parole period of...

Court Disposition

The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for six years with a non-parole period of three and a half years.

Orders

  • ['Wesley Patric Waterman is sentenced to imprisonment for six years, to date from 16 November, 2000.' 'A non-parole period of three and a half years is fixed.' 'The offender will be eligible for release on parole on 15 May, 2004.']