REGINA v Andrew Glen MUDDLE [2004] NSWSC 403
The accused was convicted of manslaughter because, although he believed it was necessary to stab the deceased to defend himself, his response was excessive and not reasonable in the circumstances, particularly as the deceased was unarmed and the force used was considerable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Verdict of Guilty of Manslaughter
- Outcome
- Convicted of manslaughter. Sentenced to six years' imprisonment, non-parole period of three years.
- Legal Topics
- ['manslaughter' 'sentencing' 'self Defence' 'excessive Self Defence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Verdict of Guilty of Manslaughter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the accused was guilty of murder or manslaughter' 'Whether the stabbing was an act of self-defence or excessive self-defence' 'Appropriate sentence for manslaughter arising from excessive self-defence']
Ratio Decidendi
The accused was convicted of manslaughter because, although he believed it was necessary to stab the deceased to defend himself, his response was excessive and not reasonable in the circumstances, particularly as the deceased was unarmed and the force used was considerable.
Court Disposition
Convicted of manslaughter. Sentenced to six years' imprisonment, non-parole period of three years.
Orders
- ["Sentenced to a term of six years' imprisonment to-date from 15 December 2003" 'Sentence will expire on 14 December 2009' 'Non-parole period of three years fixed' 'Eligible for consideration of release on parole on 14 December 2006']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment