Regina v Juanita Leslie Schoultz [2007] NSWSC 809

Regina v Juanita Leslie Schoultz [2007] NSWSC 809

The offender killed her child by a deliberate act done with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, but the offence was dealt with as manslaughter because of substantial impairment by abnormality of mind. In light of the seriousness of the killing, the guilty plea, remorse, prior good character, mental illness, need for treatment, risk associated with cannabis use, and need for careful supervision on release, a non-parole period of three and one-half years and a balance of sentence of three and one-half years were imposed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 July 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Remarks on Sentence After Guilty Plea
Outcome
The offender was sentenced to a non-parole period of three and one-half years commencing on 21 June 2005 and expiring on 20 December 2008, and to a balance of sentence of three and one-half years expiring on 20 June 2012.
Legal Topics
['manslaughter' 'substantial Impairment by Abnormality of Mind' 'guilty Plea' 'non Parole Period' 'mental Illness' 'remorse' 'child Homicide']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['manslaughter' 'substantial Impairment by Abnormality of Mind' 'guilty Plea' 'non Parole Period' 'mental Illness' 'remorse' 'child Homicide']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Remarks on Sentence After Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["What sentence should be imposed for the offender's manslaughter of her child after a plea accepted on the basis of substantial impairment by abnormality of mind." 'Whether and to what extent the guilty plea mitigated sentence despite being entered shortly before trial.' "Whether the offender's mental condition, remorse, prior good character, need for treatment, and need for supervision affected the non-parole period and balance of sentence."]

Ratio Decidendi

The offender killed her child by a deliberate act done with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, but the offence was dealt with as manslaughter because of substantial impairment by abnormality of mind. In light of the seriousness of the killing, the guilty plea, remorse, prior good character, mental illness, need for treatment, risk associated with cannabis use, and need for careful supervision on release, a non-parole period of three and one-half years and a balance of sentence of three and one-half years were imposed.

Court Disposition

The offender was sentenced to a non-parole period of three and one-half years commencing on 21 June 2005 and expiring on 20 December 2008, and to a balance of sentence of three and one-half years expiring on 20 June 2012.

Orders

  • ['The offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of three and one-half years, commencing on 21 June 2005 and expiring on 20 December 2008.' 'The offender is sentenced to a balance of sentence of three and one-half years, expiring on 20 June 2012.' 'The first day upon which she will become eligible for release on...