R v Good [2010] NSWSC 402

R v Good [2010] NSWSC 402

The offender's manslaughter was to be sentenced on the basis of excessive self-defence: he personally believed stabbing the deceased was necessary to defend himself, but that response was not reasonable in the circumstances as he perceived them. The Crown did not prove that he brought the knife to the party for use against the deceased. The offence was objectively serious because a human life was needlessly taken, the offender used a knife, stabbed the deceased six times, intended at least grievous bodily harm, had prior violent offending, and was on conditional liberty. Mitigating factors included the earliest possible offer to plead guilty to manslaughter warranting a 25% discount,...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 May 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Remarks on Sentence After Jury Acquitted the Offender of Murder and Convicted Him of Manslaughter
Outcome
The offender was sentenced for manslaughter to a non-parole period of 4 years 9 months and a total sentence of 7 years 9 months imprisonment.
Legal Topics
['manslaughter' 'excessive Self Defence' 'use of Knife' 'early Offer to Plead Guilty' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['manslaughter' 'excessive Self Defence' 'use of Knife' 'early Offer to Plead Guilty' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence / Remarks on Sentence After Jury Acquitted the Offender of Murder and Convicted Him of Manslaughter

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for the manslaughter of Mario Banovic after the offender was convicted on the basis of excessive self-defence.' 'Whether the offender brought the knife to the party intending to use it in a confrontation with the deceased.' "What weight should be given to the offender's early offer to plead guilty to manslaughter, remorse, youth, rehabilitation prospects, prior violent offending, conditional liberty, and use of a weapon." 'How the sentence should be structured having regard to the sentence imposed for breach of the suspended sentence bond and the principle of totality.']

Ratio Decidendi

The offender's manslaughter was to be sentenced on the basis of excessive self-defence: he personally believed stabbing the deceased was necessary to defend himself, but that response was not reasonable in the circumstances as he perceived them. The Crown did not prove that he brought the knife to the party for use against the deceased. The offence was objectively serious because a human life was needlessly taken, the offender used a knife, stabbed the deceased six times, intended at least grievous bodily harm, had prior violent offending, and was on conditional liberty. Mitigating factors included the earliest possible offer to plead guilty to manslaughter warranting a 25% discount,...

Court Disposition

The offender was sentenced for manslaughter to a non-parole period of 4 years 9 months and a total sentence of 7 years 9 months imprisonment.

Orders

  • ['For the manslaughter of Mario Banovic, the offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 4 years 9 months to commence on 9 December 2008 and to expire on 8 September 2013.' 'The offender is sentenced to a total sentence of 7 years 9 months imprisonment to expire on 8 September 2016.' 'The offender will be...