R v Cakovski [2005] NSWSC 1001

R v Cakovski [2005] NSWSC 1001

The offender's manslaughter was serious because he approached the deceased pursuant to a plan to rob him, was armed with a knife, inflicted fatal stab wounds, and took no steps to obtain aid. Although the plea of guilty had utilitarian value, it was late and did not establish genuine remorse, so a discount of approximately fifteen percent, rather than twenty-five percent, was allowed. Special circumstances were found due to the offender's age and time in custody, but only a minor adjustment was made because the gravity of the crime required the non-parole period imposed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 October 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Sentence After Plea of Guilty
Outcome
The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for seven years eight months commencing 28 April 2003 and expiring 27 December 2010, with a non-parole period of five years eight months.
Legal Topics
['manslaughter' 'excessive Self Defence' 'plea of Guilty' 'use of Knife' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['manslaughter' 'excessive Self Defence' 'plea of Guilty' 'use of Knife' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Sentence After Plea of Guilty

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for manslaughter on the basis of excessive self defence after a plea of guilty.' 'Whether aggravating features included use of a knife, the plan to rob the deceased, being armed when approaching the deceased, and offending while on bail.' 'What discount should be allowed for the utilitarian value of the guilty plea.' 'Whether genuine remorse and favourable prospects of rehabilitation were established.' 'Whether special circumstances justified adjustment of the non-parole period.']

Ratio Decidendi

The offender's manslaughter was serious because he approached the deceased pursuant to a plan to rob him, was armed with a knife, inflicted fatal stab wounds, and took no steps to obtain aid. Although the plea of guilty had utilitarian value, it was late and did not establish genuine remorse, so a discount of approximately fifteen percent, rather than twenty-five percent, was allowed. Special circumstances were found due to the offender's age and time in custody, but only a minor adjustment was made because the gravity of the crime required the non-parole period imposed.

Court Disposition

The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for seven years eight months commencing 28 April 2003 and expiring 27 December 2010, with a non-parole period of five years eight months.

Orders

  • ['The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of seven years eight months, commencing 28 April 2003 and to expire on 27 December 2010.' 'A non parole period of five years eight months is set.' '27 December 2008 is specified as the first date upon which the offender will be eligible for release on parole.']