REGINA v. WILLOUGHBY [2001] NSWSC 1015

REGINA v. WILLOUGHBY [2001] NSWSC 1015

The offender committed a serious manslaughter by pursuing and viciously assaulting the deceased, causing death by a lacerated mesentery, in circumstances where a reasonable person would have realised the conduct posed a real risk to life and well-being. However, he did not intend to kill or seriously injure the deceased, had no prior record, pleaded guilty to manslaughter, had spent time in custody and on conditional liberty, acted under severe emotional and psychological pressures with drug involvement and flawed perceptions, showed some contrition, and had rehabilitation prospects if treated. Those matters justified reducing an otherwise appropriate head sentence of about nine years to...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 November 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Sentence Following Guilty Plea
Outcome
The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for six years and nine months with a non-parole period of three years and nine months, commencing on 18 October 2001, with earliest eligibility for release on parole on 17 July 2005.
Legal Topics
['manslaughter' 'plea of Guilty' 'unlawful and Objectively Dangerous Act' 'subjective Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['manslaughter' 'plea of Guilty' 'unlawful and Objectively Dangerous Act' 'subjective Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Sentence Following Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for manslaughter committed by an unlawful and objectively dangerous assault after a plea of guilty.' "What allowance should be made for the offender's plea of guilty, time in custody, time on conditional liberty, contrition, mental state, personal circumstances and prospects of rehabilitation." 'Whether special circumstances justified a non-parole period shorter than the statutory proportion of the head sentence.']

Ratio Decidendi

The offender committed a serious manslaughter by pursuing and viciously assaulting the deceased, causing death by a lacerated mesentery, in circumstances where a reasonable person would have realised the conduct posed a real risk to life and well-being. However, he did not intend to kill or seriously injure the deceased, had no prior record, pleaded guilty to manslaughter, had spent time in custody and on conditional liberty, acted under severe emotional and psychological pressures with drug involvement and flawed perceptions, showed some contrition, and had rehabilitation prospects if treated. Those matters justified reducing an otherwise appropriate head sentence of about nine years to...

Court Disposition

The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for six years and nine months with a non-parole period of three years and nine months, commencing on 18 October 2001, with earliest eligibility for release on parole on 17 July 2005.

Orders

  • ['The offender is sentenced to imprisonment for six years and nine months.' 'A non-parole period of three years and nine months is imposed.' 'The sentence is to date from 18 October 2001.' 'The earliest date on which the offender is eligible for release on parole is 17 July 2005.']