Regina v Mohamad Ali [2005] NSWSC 334

Regina v Mohamad Ali [2005] NSWSC 334

Although the deceased created an unwanted, threatening and seriously provocative situation and the offence was not preplanned, the Prisoner deliberately fired fatal further shots after the deceased had been seriously injured and was seeking refuge. The response was excessive and involved the unlawful taking of life with specific intent. Taking into account the objective seriousness, provocation, limited personal deterrence, need for general deterrence, remorse, prospects of rehabilitation, prior custody and delay, a custodial sentence of 7 years and 6 months with a non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months was appropriate, adjusted for pre-sentence custody to 5 years and 8 months with a...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Jury Verdict of Not Guilty of Murder But Guilty of Manslaughter
Outcome
The Prisoner was sentenced for manslaughter to imprisonment for 5 years and 8 months commencing 18 April 2005, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 8 months expiring on 17 December 2007.
Legal Topics
['manslaughter' 'shooting' 'excessive Self Defence' 'provocation' 'accumulation of Provocative Conduct' 'specific Intent' 'deterrence']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['manslaughter' 'shooting' 'excessive Self Defence' 'provocation' 'accumulation of Provocative Conduct' 'specific Intent' 'deterrence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Jury Verdict of Not Guilty of Murder But Guilty of Manslaughter

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["What factual basis should be adopted for the jury's manslaughter verdict." 'Whether the manslaughter was properly understood as excessive self-defence, provocation, or both.' 'What sentence should be imposed for a deliberate shooting causing death in circumstances involving serious provocation and threatened violence.' 'What aggravating and mitigating factors under the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 should affect sentence.' 'Whether special circumstances justified altering the statutory ratio between the non-parole period and the head sentence.']

Ratio Decidendi

Although the deceased created an unwanted, threatening and seriously provocative situation and the offence was not preplanned, the Prisoner deliberately fired fatal further shots after the deceased had been seriously injured and was seeking refuge. The response was excessive and involved the unlawful taking of life with specific intent. Taking into account the objective seriousness, provocation, limited personal deterrence, need for general deterrence, remorse, prospects of rehabilitation, prior custody and delay, a custodial sentence of 7 years and 6 months with a non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months was appropriate, adjusted for pre-sentence custody to 5 years and 8 months with a...

Court Disposition

The Prisoner was sentenced for manslaughter to imprisonment for 5 years and 8 months commencing 18 April 2005, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 8 months expiring on 17 December 2007.

Orders

  • ['Abbas Mohamad Ali is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 5 years and 8 months to date from 18 April 2005.' 'A non-parole period of 2 years and 8 months is set to date from 18 April 2005 and to expire on 17 December 2007, being the earliest parole release eligibility date.']