R v Kari; R v H; R v Hamid [2008] NSWSC 993
The offenders' crimes were serious: Kari and H participated in a violent criminal enterprise at the victim's home, in company and while subject to conditional liberty, resulting in Matthew Hughan's death; Hamid's culpability was lower but his assistance to the principal offenders and related firearm conduct were serious, and the home invasion offence was also grave. Sentences were moderated for youth, remorse, rehabilitation prospects, delay, guilty pleas of significant utilitarian value, special circumstances, prior custody and, for H, totality, while maintaining punishment and deterrence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Remarks on Sentence After Pleas of Guilty
- Outcome
- All three offenders were sentenced to imprisonment.
- Legal Topics
- ['manslaughter' 'accessory After the Fact to Manslaughter' 'form 1 Matters' 'entering a Dwelling House in Company With Intent to Steal' 'juvenile Offender' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'totality' 'rehabilitation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Remarks on Sentence After Pleas of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentences should be imposed on Georgeus Kari and H for manslaughter, taking into account their Form 1 matters.' 'What sentences should be imposed on Jamal Hamid for accessory after the fact to manslaughter, taking into account the Form 1 matter, and for entering a dwelling house in company with intent to steal.' "How the offenders' youth, remorse, rehabilitation prospects, delay, guilty pleas, prior custody and the principle of totality should affect sentence."]
Ratio Decidendi
The offenders' crimes were serious: Kari and H participated in a violent criminal enterprise at the victim's home, in company and while subject to conditional liberty, resulting in Matthew Hughan's death; Hamid's culpability was lower but his assistance to the principal offenders and related firearm conduct were serious, and the home invasion offence was also grave. Sentences were moderated for youth, remorse, rehabilitation prospects, delay, guilty pleas of significant utilitarian value, special circumstances, prior custody and, for H, totality, while maintaining punishment and deterrence.
Court Disposition
All three offenders were sentenced to imprisonment.
Orders
- ['Georgeus Kari, for manslaughter and taking into account the Form 1 matter, was sentenced to a non-parole period of 4½ years commencing on 4 August 2005 and expiring on 3 February 2010, and a balance of term of 2½ years commencing on 4 February 2010 and expiring on 3 August 2012.' 'H, for manslaughter and taking...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment