Regina v Leeanne Terese Trevenna [2003] NSWSC 463
A substantial custodial sentence is required for manslaughter involving the use of a firearm and the taking of life, even with strong subjective mitigating circumstances such as excessive self-defence, history of violence by the deceased, and the offender's plea and remorse. The appropriate sentence reflects both deterrence and the prospect of rehabilitation, with allowance for special circumstances.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Offender: Leeanne Terese Trevenna
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence After Plea to Manslaughter
- Outcome
- Sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Self Defence, Sentencing, Excessive Self Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Leeanne Terese Trevenna
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence After Plea to Manslaughter
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for manslaughter following plea of guilty based on excessive self-defence
- 2 Application of Crimes Act 1900 s 421 and relevant sentencing principles under Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Ratio Decidendi
A substantial custodial sentence is required for manslaughter involving the use of a firearm and the taking of life, even with strong subjective mitigating circumstances such as excessive self-defence, history of violence by the deceased, and the offender's plea and remorse. The appropriate sentence reflects both deterrence and the prospect of rehabilitation, with allowance for special circumstances.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- Offender sentenced to 7½ years imprisonment commencing 7 December 2000, expiring 6 June 2008.
- Non-parole period of 4½ years from 7 December 2000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment