Regina v Thang Quoc LUONG [2000] NSWSC 505
The prisoner unlawfully killed Jenny Liu by firing a sawn-off rifle in a small bedroom where several people were present without taking precise steps to ensure the weapon was clear. Although he was young, remorseful, had no criminal antecedents and had positive subjective features, the objective gravity of the manslaughter was high and required denunciation. Non-custodial options, community service, a bond, deferral, periodic detention, home detention and suspension were inappropriate; a four-year head sentence with a two-year non-parole period was warranted, with special circumstances justifying a longer than usual period of parole supervision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / On Sentence After Jury Verdict of Guilty
- Outcome
- The prisoner was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to imprisonment for 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years, commencing on 16 May 2000; the earliest parole eligibility date is 15 May 2002.
- Legal Topics
- ['manslaughter' 'unlawful and Dangerous Act Manslaughter' 'criminal Negligence Manslaughter' 'full Time Imprisonment' 'non Parole Period' 'youth Offender Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / On Sentence After Jury Verdict of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the prisoner's manslaughter was sufficiently objectively grave to require full-time imprisonment rather than an alternative sentencing option." 'Whether special circumstances justified a non-parole period of less than three-quarters of the head sentence.' 'What sentence should be imposed for manslaughter committed by firing a sawn-off rifle in a bedroom without ensuring it was clear.']
Ratio Decidendi
The prisoner unlawfully killed Jenny Liu by firing a sawn-off rifle in a small bedroom where several people were present without taking precise steps to ensure the weapon was clear. Although he was young, remorseful, had no criminal antecedents and had positive subjective features, the objective gravity of the manslaughter was high and required denunciation. Non-custodial options, community service, a bond, deferral, periodic detention, home detention and suspension were inappropriate; a four-year head sentence with a two-year non-parole period was warranted, with special circumstances justifying a longer than usual period of parole supervision.
Court Disposition
The prisoner was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to imprisonment for 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years, commencing on 16 May 2000; the earliest parole eligibility date is 15 May 2002.
Orders
- ["Upon the jury's verdict that the prisoner is guilty of manslaughter, he is convicted." 'The prisoner is sentenced to imprisonment for 4 years, with a non-parole period of 2 years.' 'The sentence and the non-parole period are taken to have commenced on 16 May 2000.' 'The earliest date on which the prisoner will be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment