R v Terrence David KAIN [2013] NSWSC 638

R v Terrence David KAIN [2013] NSWSC 638

The Court was left with a reasonable doubt that the offender intended to kill his mother or cause her grievous bodily harm, despite finding that he intentionally inflicted significant violence and knew he was strangling and seriously hurting her. He was therefore sentenced on the basis of manslaughter by an unlawful and dangerous act, with his alcohol induced persisting dementia substantially reducing moral and criminal responsibility, but the seriousness of causing death requiring imprisonment. Allowing a 25% early plea discount from a 9 year starting point and adjusting for special circumstances, the Court imposed 6 years and 9 months with a non-parole period of 4 years commencing 27...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Sentence After Jury Acquitted the Accused of Murder and Convicted Him of Manslaughter
Outcome
The offender is sentenced to a term of 6 years and 9 months with a non-parole period of 4 years, commencing on 27 February 2011.
Legal Topics
['manslaughter' 'unlawful and Dangerous Act Causing Death' 'intention' 'mental Impairment' 'early Guilty Plea Discount' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['manslaughter' 'unlawful and Dangerous Act Causing Death' 'intention' 'mental Impairment' 'early Guilty Plea Discount' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Sentence After Jury Acquitted the Accused of Murder and Convicted Him of Manslaughter

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the offender intended to kill or cause grievous bodily harm, affecting the seriousness of the manslaughter sentence.' 'Whether the offender should be sentenced on the basis of manslaughter by unlawful and dangerous act.' "What weight should be given to the offender's dementia, alcoholism, depression, remorse, lack of prior convictions, time on remand, early plea and need for parole supervision."]

Ratio Decidendi

The Court was left with a reasonable doubt that the offender intended to kill his mother or cause her grievous bodily harm, despite finding that he intentionally inflicted significant violence and knew he was strangling and seriously hurting her. He was therefore sentenced on the basis of manslaughter by an unlawful and dangerous act, with his alcohol induced persisting dementia substantially reducing moral and criminal responsibility, but the seriousness of causing death requiring imprisonment. Allowing a 25% early plea discount from a 9 year starting point and adjusting for special circumstances, the Court imposed 6 years and 9 months with a non-parole period of 4 years commencing 27...

Court Disposition

The offender is sentenced to a term of 6 years and 9 months with a non-parole period of 4 years, commencing on 27 February 2011.

Orders

  • ['The offender is sentenced to a term of 6 years and 9 months.' 'A non-parole period of 4 years is imposed.' 'The sentence commences on 27 February 2011.']