R v Bushell (No 18) [2023] NSWSC 1454
Because the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) creates criminal offences relating to administration of illicit drugs, and the death was a direct consequence of that administration, proof beyond reasonable doubt that the accused participated by administering or aiding and abetting the administration of the illicit drug would establish an unlawful act for manslaughter. Consent of the deceased, if any, is irrelevant to that unlawfulness; whether the act was dangerous is for the jury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Proceedings Involving Murder With Manslaughter as an Alternative Statutory Offence / Procedural Ruling During Jury Trial on Jury Questions and Written Directions
- Outcome
- The Jury will be informed that consent of the deceased is irrelevant to unlawfulness for the purpose of manslaughter by an unlawful and dangerous act.
- Legal Topics
- ['manslaughter by Unlawful and Dangerous Act' 'administration of Illicit Drugs' 'consent to Assault' 'aiding and Abetting' 'jury Directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Proceedings Involving Murder With Manslaughter as an Alternative Statutory Offence / Procedural Ruling During Jury Trial on Jury Questions and Written Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the deceased's consent was relevant to unlawfulness for manslaughter by an unlawful and dangerous act where the death followed administration of an illicit mixture of cocaine and heroin." 'Whether reliance on ss 12, 13 and 14 of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) changed the Crown case.' 'Whether dangerousness of the act was a matter for the jury.' 'Whether the accused needed to be aware that there was no consent.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) creates criminal offences relating to administration of illicit drugs, and the death was a direct consequence of that administration, proof beyond reasonable doubt that the accused participated by administering or aiding and abetting the administration of the illicit drug would establish an unlawful act for manslaughter. Consent of the deceased, if any, is irrelevant to that unlawfulness; whether the act was dangerous is for the jury.
Court Disposition
The Jury will be informed that consent of the deceased is irrelevant to unlawfulness for the purpose of manslaughter by an unlawful and dangerous act.
Orders
- ['The Jury will be informed that consent of the deceased in this case is irrelevant to unlawfulness for the purpose of manslaughter by an unlawful and dangerous act.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment