R v CK; R v TCS [2007] NSWSC 1424

R v CK; R v TCS [2007] NSWSC 1424

The offence was an entirely senseless, unprovoked and callous assault in company causing the unlawful taking of a human life, but it was manslaughter by unlawful and dangerous act at the lower end of the broad manslaughter range and both offenders were juveniles who pleaded guilty early. A sentence of 6 years imprisonment after a 25% discount was appropriate, with special circumstances because both offenders needed lengthy supervision and counselling after release. CK required a longer period in custody because he instigated the assault and was subject to a bond at the time, while TS had no criminal history and better prospects of rehabilitation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 December 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter by Unlawful and Dangerous Act / Sentence After Guilty Pleas in the Griffith Children's Court and Adherence to the Pleas on Arraignment in the Supreme Court
Outcome
Both offenders were convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to imprisonment with non-parole periods, to be served in a juvenile justice centre, with parole supervision by the Probation and Parole Service.
Legal Topics
['manslaughter by Unlawful and Dangerous Act' 'juvenile Offenders' 'offence Committed in Company' 'unprovoked Assault' 'early Guilty Plea' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['manslaughter by Unlawful and Dangerous Act' 'juvenile Offenders' 'offence Committed in Company' 'unprovoked Assault' 'early Guilty Plea' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter by Unlawful and Dangerous Act / Sentence After Guilty Pleas in the Griffith Children's Court and Adherence to the Pleas on Arraignment in the Supreme Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What sentences should be imposed on juvenile offenders who pleaded guilty to manslaughter by unlawful and dangerous act committed in company during an unprovoked assault.' "How the offenders' youth, subjective circumstances, rehabilitation prospects, criminal history, remorse, early guilty pleas and need for supervision should affect sentence." 'Whether special circumstances were warranted to provide longer supervision and counselling after release from custody.']

Ratio Decidendi

The offence was an entirely senseless, unprovoked and callous assault in company causing the unlawful taking of a human life, but it was manslaughter by unlawful and dangerous act at the lower end of the broad manslaughter range and both offenders were juveniles who pleaded guilty early. A sentence of 6 years imprisonment after a 25% discount was appropriate, with special circumstances because both offenders needed lengthy supervision and counselling after release. CK required a longer period in custody because he instigated the assault and was subject to a bond at the time, while TS had no criminal history and better prospects of rehabilitation.

Court Disposition

Both offenders were convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to imprisonment with non-parole periods, to be served in a juvenile justice centre, with parole supervision by the Probation and Parole Service.

Orders

  • ['CK: On the offence of Manslaughter, convicted and sentenced to a non-parole period of 4 years, to date from 2 January 2007 and expire 1 January 2011, with a balance of term of 2 years expiring 1 January 2013.' 'CK: Eligible to be released at the expiration of the non-parole period.' 'CK: Pursuant to s 19 of the...