Kirribilli Film Productions Pty Ltd & Ors v One Australia America's Cup Team 1995 Pty Ltd & Anor [1995] FCA 377
Applicants made out a sufficient case for interlocutory relief by way of Mareva injunction given risk of asset dissipation, and for an order for security for costs, with figures for both measures to be conservatively set based on the evidence and argument.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Mareva Injunction and Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Interlocutory relief granted. Mareva injunction to be ordered for $200,000 unless parties agree otherwise. Security for costs ordered in amount of $40,000, with details to be settled by parties.
- Legal Topics
- ['mareva Injunction' 'security for Costs' 'copyright Infringement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Mareva Injunction and Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there is a serious question to be tried for the purposes of interlocutory relief' 'Whether the applicants are entitled to a Mareva injunction' "Whether the applicants are required to provide security for the respondents' costs"]
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants made out a sufficient case for interlocutory relief by way of Mareva injunction given risk of asset dissipation, and for an order for security for costs, with figures for both measures to be conservatively set based on the evidence and argument.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory relief granted. Mareva injunction to be ordered for $200,000 unless parties agree otherwise. Security for costs ordered in amount of $40,000, with details to be settled by parties.
Orders
- ["Applicants entitled to interlocutory Mareva injunction in the amount of $200,000 (subject to parties' agreement on form)." 'Respondents ordered to provide security for costs in the amount of $40,000, possibly paid in stages.' "Costs of Mareva application to be applicants' costs in the principal proceeding."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment