Deery v Deery [1954] HCA 4
Constructive desertion was not established because the wife's conduct, though emotionally unstable and difficult, lacked the necessary intention to drive the husband away, and her actions did not amount to an intentional persistence in conduct calculated to bring about a rupture of the matrimonial relationship.
- Parties
- Petitioner/respondent: Arthur Deery (formerly Arthur Deutsch); Respondent/appellant: Perla Pola Deery (formerly Perla Pola Deutsch)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 1954
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decree nisi discharged; petition dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Matrimonial Causes, Dissolution of Marriage, Constructive Desertion, Intention in Desertion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arthur Deery (formerly Arthur Deutsch)
Petitioner/respondent
Perla Pola Deery (formerly Perla Pola Deutsch)
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the wife's conduct amounted to constructive desertion under Marriage Act 1928 (Vict.) s. 75(a)
- 2 Whether intention to bring about rupture or intention to persist in conduct calculated to bring about rupture was established
Ratio Decidendi
Constructive desertion was not established because the wife's conduct, though emotionally unstable and difficult, lacked the necessary intention to drive the husband away, and her actions did not amount to an intentional persistence in conduct calculated to bring about a rupture of the matrimonial relationship.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decree nisi discharged; petition dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Decree nisi discharged.
- Suit dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment