Transport Workers' Union of New South Wales v Patrick Murray [2008] NSWIRComm 6
Section 263(5) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 does not confer an absolute and unqualified right on a member to inspect an organisation's accounting records. Construed in context and having regard to the Act's purpose of responsible management and democratic control of industrial organisations, the right is qualified by a requirement that inspection be sought bona fide and not for a purpose inconsistent with the interests of the organisation and its members. Because s 266 uses the permissive word "may" and empowers the Commission to enforce the Division by order, the Court has a discretion both whether to grant relief and what relief may be granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application by Transport Workers' Union of New South Wales for Declaratory Relief Under S 154 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996; Application by Patrick Murray for an Order Under S 266 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Preliminary Questions of Law
- Outcome
- Preliminary questions answered: Mr Murray does not have an absolute right to inspect under s 263(5); the Court has a discretion under s 266 as to whether to grant relief and what relief may be granted. Costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['member Inspection of Accounting Records' 'industrial Organisation Accountability' 'good Faith and Proper Purpose' 'discretion to Grant Relief Under S 266 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application by Transport Workers' Union of New South Wales for Declaratory Relief Under S 154 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996; Application by Patrick Murray for an Order Under S 266 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Preliminary Questions of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Does Mr Murray have an absolute right to inspect accounting records under s 263(5) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996, even assuming he is not acting in good faith or for a proper purpose?' 'Does the Court have a discretion under s 266 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 as to whether to grant relief and/or as to what relief may be granted?']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 263(5) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 does not confer an absolute and unqualified right on a member to inspect an organisation's accounting records. Construed in context and having regard to the Act's purpose of responsible management and democratic control of industrial organisations, the right is qualified by a requirement that inspection be sought bona fide and not for a purpose inconsistent with the interests of the organisation and its members. Because s 266 uses the permissive word "may" and empowers the Commission to enforce the Division by order, the Court has a discretion both whether to grant relief and what relief may be granted.
Court Disposition
Preliminary questions answered: Mr Murray does not have an absolute right to inspect under s 263(5); the Court has a discretion under s 266 as to whether to grant relief and what relief may be granted. Costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Question 1: Does Mr Murray have an absolute right to inspect under s 263(5) of the Act, even assuming he is not acting in good faith or for a proper purpose? Answer: No.' 'Question 2: Does the Court have a discretion under s 266 of the Act as to whether to grant relief and as to what relief may be granted? Answer:...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment