Police v DMO [2015] NSWChC 4
Section 33(1)(b) of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 does not preclude charges being relisted where a defendant is admitted to a mental health facility. Read with s 32 of the Mental Health Act 2007 and s 33 as a whole, the only mechanisms for dismissal in s 33 are s 33(1)(c) and s 33(2).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Whether Proceedings Could Be Relisted After an Order Under S 33(1)(b) of the Mental Health (forensic Provisions) Act 1990
- Outcome
- The Court rejected the defence contention that the charges had been finalised and held that the proceedings could be relisted.
- Legal Topics
- ['mental Health (forensic Provisions) Act 1990 S 33(1)(b)' 'relisting of Charges After Mental Health Assessment' 'dismissal of Charges Under S 33(2)' 'interaction Between Mental Health (forensic Provisions) Act 1990 and Mental Health Act 2007']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Whether Proceedings Could Be Relisted After an Order Under S 33(1)(b) of the Mental Health (forensic Provisions) Act 1990
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the admission of the young person to a mental health facility pursuant to an order under s 33(1)(b) of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 operates to finalise the charges.' 'Whether charges can be relisted after a defendant is assessed as mentally ill or mentally disordered and detained under the Mental Health Act 2007.' 'Whether s 32 of the Mental Health Act 2007 provides a mechanism for returning a person to court after an order under s 33(1)(b) of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990.']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 33(1)(b) of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 does not preclude charges being relisted where a defendant is admitted to a mental health facility. Read with s 32 of the Mental Health Act 2007 and s 33 as a whole, the only mechanisms for dismissal in s 33 are s 33(1)(c) and s 33(2).
Court Disposition
The Court rejected the defence contention that the charges had been finalised and held that the proceedings could be relisted.
Orders
- ["The proceedings in relation to the young person DM [H57623664] are to be relisted before the Children's Court on a date to be fixed before 8 March 2016."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment