R v Huy Pham [2007] NSWSC 1313

R v Huy Pham [2007] NSWSC 1313

On the unanimous and unshaken evidence of both psychiatric experts, the accused suffered from a delusional disorder at the relevant time, depriving him of knowledge that his actions were morally wrong, thus warranting a finding of not guilty by reason of mental illness under the M'Naghten rules and the Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Accused: Huy Pham
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judge Alone Trial; Verdict
Outcome
Not guilty by reason of mental illness
Legal Topics
Mental Illness, M'naghten Rules, Not Guilty by Reason of Mental Illness
Criminal Law Mental Illness M'naghten Rules Not Guilty by Reason of Mental Illness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Huy Pham

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judge Alone Trial; Verdict

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused was not guilty by reason of mental illness at the time of committing the acts charged

Ratio Decidendi

On the unanimous and unshaken evidence of both psychiatric experts, the accused suffered from a delusional disorder at the relevant time, depriving him of knowledge that his actions were morally wrong, thus warranting a finding of not guilty by reason of mental illness under the M'Naghten rules and the Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act.

Court Disposition

Not guilty by reason of mental illness

Orders

  • The accused be detained in a Correctional Centre or such other facility as the Mental Health Tribunal may determine, until released by due process of law.