Hua Cheng International Holdings Group Pty Ltd (Receivers & Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation) v James Hui Xiao Xu [2020] NSWSC 922
The third defendant was liable for mesne profits because she remained in possession of Lot 10 without right after the contract for sale was terminated and the required date to vacate passed, and the calculation of those profits was properly based on market rent less a reasonable vacancy allowance.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Hua Cheng International Holdings Group Pty Ltd (Receivers & Managers Appointed) (in Liquidation); Second Plaintiff: Super Vision Resources Ltd (BVI Registered No 1810534); First Defendant: James Hui Xiao Xu; Second Defendant: Thomas Xi Yao Xu; Third Defendant: Caiwei Xu; Fourth Defendant: Qiao Wang; Fifth Defendant: Samuel Jiang
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Commercial List / Judgment After Hearing on Unopposed Claim for Mesne Profits
- Outcome
- Judgment for the first plaintiff against the third defendant for mesne profits, interest, and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Mesne Profits, Possession of Land, Damages, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hua Cheng International Holdings Group Pty Ltd (Receivers & Managers Appointed) (in Liquidation)
First Plaintiff
Super Vision Resources Ltd (BVI Registered No 1810534)
Second Plaintiff
James Hui Xiao Xu
First Defendant
Thomas Xi Yao Xu
Second Defendant
Caiwei Xu
Third Defendant
Qiao Wang
Fourth Defendant
Samuel Jiang
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Commercial List / Judgment After Hearing on Unopposed Claim for Mesne Profits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the third defendant, Caiwei Xu, is liable in mesne profits to the first plaintiff for remaining in possession of Lot 10 after termination of the contract for sale and required date to vacate.
Ratio Decidendi
The third defendant was liable for mesne profits because she remained in possession of Lot 10 without right after the contract for sale was terminated and the required date to vacate passed, and the calculation of those profits was properly based on market rent less a reasonable vacancy allowance.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the first plaintiff against the third defendant for mesne profits, interest, and costs.
Orders
- Leave granted to the first plaintiff to file the Amended Summons dated 20 July 2020.
- Judgment for the first plaintiff against the third defendant in the amount of $48,214.00 plus interest of $4,623.05.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment