SZUUM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 1) [2016] FCA 519

SZUUM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 1) [2016] FCA 519

The appellants had adequate notice and opportunity, and despite language and legal challenges, failed to act in time; granting an adjournment would prejudice the court's schedule and displace other cases; therefore, the application for adjournment is refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Adjournment of Appeal
Outcome
Application for adjournment refused
Legal Topics
['migration' 'practice and Procedure' 'adjournment of Appeal']
['administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights'] ['migration' 'practice and Procedure' 'adjournment of Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Adjournment of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an adjournment of the appeal should be granted']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellants had adequate notice and opportunity, and despite language and legal challenges, failed to act in time; granting an adjournment would prejudice the court's schedule and displace other cases; therefore, the application for adjournment is refused.

Court Disposition

Application for adjournment refused

Orders

  • ['Application for adjournment is refused']