Andaloro v Wyong Co-operative Dairy Society Ltd [1966] HCA 61

Andaloro v Wyong Co-operative Dairy Society Ltd [1966] HCA 61

By majority, the High Court held that the appellants failed because neither the general law, their certificate of registration, nor s. 27 of the Milk Act, 1931-1965 (NSW) imposed a statutory duty on the Milk Board, its agent, or the Co-operative to accept the milk tendered by the appellants. Milk was not vested in the Board before accepted delivery, and in the absence of contract or quota the Board could reject the milk. The appellants therefore had no basis for the declarations or injunctions sought.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court of Australia Appeal From the Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Which by Majority Reversed the Trial Judge and Dismissed the Appellants' Suit in Equity
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['milk Act, 1931 1965 (nsw)' 'milk Board Powers and Duties' 'dairyman Certificate of Registration' 'supply, Delivery and Acceptance of Milk' 'vesting of Milk in the Milk Board' 'injunctions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / High Court of Australia Appeal From the Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Which by Majority Reversed the Trial Judge and Dismissed the Appellants' Suit in Equity

  1. 1 ["Whether the Milk Act, 1931-1965 (NSW) or the appellants' certificate of registration imposed a duty on the respondents to accept milk which the appellants attempted to deliver at the Wyong Co-operative Dairy Society Limited factory." 'Whether milk became vested in the Milk Board before delivery and acceptance, or only upon accepted delivery for consumption or use within a milk distributing district.' 'Whether the appellants were entitled to declarations and injunctive relief restraining the respondents from refusing to receive their milk.']

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, the High Court held that the appellants failed because neither the general law, their certificate of registration, nor s. 27 of the Milk Act, 1931-1965 (NSW) imposed a statutory duty on the Milk Board, its agent, or the Co-operative to accept the milk tendered by the appellants. Milk was not vested in the Board before accepted delivery, and in the absence of contract or quota the Board could reject the milk. The appellants therefore had no basis for the declarations or injunctions sought.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']