The Owners – Strata Plan No 5319 v Price;; Price v The Owners – Strata Plan No 5319 [2019] NSWCATCD 3
Ms Price's application was dismissed because the evidence did not justify discretionary orders under s232 for inspection of other lots: the circumstances of historic wall removals had not been properly explored, affected lot owners were not parties, and there was no evidence that common property walls required maintenance, repair or stabilisation. The Owners Corporation's application succeeded in part because Ms Price had undertaken unauthorised works affecting common property, including removal of the internal brick wall between the laundry and pantry and demolition of a non-loadbearing segment of the wall between the kitchen and living/dining room. As those works lacked the required...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Strata Dispute in the Consumer and Commercial Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales / Principal Judgment After Hearing on Applications for Orders Concerning Unauthorised Works and Related Relief
- Outcome
- Ms Price's application was dismissed. The Owners Corporation's application was granted in part, with reinstatement orders made and further requested orders refused. Costs were reserved for determination on the papers after submissions.
- Legal Topics
- ['minor Works' 'works Affecting Common Property' 'unauthorised Works' 'owners Corporation Approval' 'common Property Reinstatement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Strata Dispute in the Consumer and Commercial Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales / Principal Judgment After Hearing on Applications for Orders Concerning Unauthorised Works and Related Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal should order appointment of a structural engineer to inspect historic internal wall removals in other lots and require the Owners Corporation to undertake recommended works.' 'Whether Ms Price undertook unauthorised works affecting common property in Lot 8.' 'Whether Ms Price should be ordered to reinstate common property and lot property affected by unauthorised works.' 'Whether further orders sought by the Owners Corporation for certification, inspection access and compensation were necessary.']
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Price's application was dismissed because the evidence did not justify discretionary orders under s232 for inspection of other lots: the circumstances of historic wall removals had not been properly explored, affected lot owners were not parties, and there was no evidence that common property walls required maintenance, repair or stabilisation. The Owners Corporation's application succeeded in part because Ms Price had undertaken unauthorised works affecting common property, including removal of the internal brick wall between the laundry and pantry and demolition of a non-loadbearing segment of the wall between the kitchen and living/dining room. As those works lacked the required...
Court Disposition
Ms Price's application was dismissed. The Owners Corporation's application was granted in part, with reinstatement orders made and further requested orders refused. Costs were reserved for determination on the papers after submissions.
Orders
- ['The lot owner, Cheree Margaret Price, at her own cost must reinstate the wall between the laundry and pantry of Lot 8 in Strata Plan No 5319 and the affected areas of the lot and common property to a structurally sound condition comparable to adjacent areas of common property not affected by the works.' 'The lot...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment