Ronald John Poppert [1991] NSWLST 11
The Solicitor engaged in a continued course of conduct of using trust funds for his own purposes, maintaining false trust records, and forging and falsifying documents to cover his defalcations. The Tribunal found serious professional misconduct, that he was unfit to practise, and that his name must be removed from the roll of solicitors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Professional Misconduct Disciplinary Complaint / Order and Reasons for Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld; Solicitor found guilty of serious professional misconduct and removed from the roll of solicitors.
- Legal Topics
- ['misappropriation of Trust Moneys' 'trust Accounting' 'forgery' 'preparation of False Documents' 'removal From Roll of Solicitors']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Professional Misconduct Disciplinary Complaint / Order and Reasons for Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Solicitor misappropriated client monies.' 'Whether the Solicitor wilfully contravened Sections 61 and 62 of the Legal Profession Act 1987.' 'Whether the Solicitor forged the signature of Elly Marie Poppert on mortgages.' 'Whether the Solicitor wilfully prepared false documents.' 'Whether the Solicitor was guilty of professional misconduct and should be removed from the roll of solicitors.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Solicitor engaged in a continued course of conduct of using trust funds for his own purposes, maintaining false trust records, and forging and falsifying documents to cover his defalcations. The Tribunal found serious professional misconduct, that he was unfit to practise, and that his name must be removed from the roll of solicitors.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld; Solicitor found guilty of serious professional misconduct and removed from the roll of solicitors.
Orders
- ['That the name of Ronald John Poppert be and the same is hereby removed from the roll of solicitors at the Supreme Court New South Wales.' 'That the costs of the Law Society of and incidental to this application be paid by the Complainant, as if taxed in the Supreme Court on a solicitor/client basis, such costs to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment