South Australian Brewing Company Pty Ltd v Carlton & United Breweries Ltd [2001] FCA 902

South Australian Brewing Company Pty Ltd v Carlton & United Breweries Ltd [2001] FCA 902

CUB did not infringe SAB's trademark or contravene the Trade Practices Act in promotions for Showdown 7 and 9, as use of 'Showdown' was generic and did not constitute trademark use or misleading conduct. For Showdown 10, CUB's promotional material did represent that it was a sponsor of AFC and PAFC and that those clubs had consented to the promotion; these representations were misleading and in breach of ss 52, 53(c) and 53(d) of the Trade Practices Act as CUB was not in fact a sponsor and did not have the clubs’ consent.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application upheld in part; cross-claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
['misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'passing Off' 'trademark Infringement' 'sponsorship Representation' 'consumer Protection']
['trade Practices' 'intellectual Property' 'trademarks' 'advertising Law'] ['misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'passing Off' 'trademark Infringement' 'sponsorship Representation' 'consumer Protection']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the use of word 'Showdown' by CUB infringed SAB's registered trademark" "Whether CUB's promotional material represented falsely that it was a sponsor of the AFC and PAFC" "Whether such conduct was misleading or deceptive or passed off CUB's goods as those of SAB" "Whether SAB's trademark in 'Showdown' should be cancelled for being non-distinctive or deceptive"]

Ratio Decidendi

CUB did not infringe SAB's trademark or contravene the Trade Practices Act in promotions for Showdown 7 and 9, as use of 'Showdown' was generic and did not constitute trademark use or misleading conduct. For Showdown 10, CUB's promotional material did represent that it was a sponsor of AFC and PAFC and that those clubs had consented to the promotion; these representations were misleading and in breach of ss 52, 53(c) and 53(d) of the Trade Practices Act as CUB was not in fact a sponsor and did not have the clubs’ consent.

Court Disposition

Application upheld in part; cross-claim dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Carlton & United Breweries Ltd restrained by injunction from promoting the sale of beer in connection with the promotional material for Showdown 10, comprising the head-to-head photograph of the two club captains and associated materials as described in the judgment.' "The cross-claim seeking cancellation of SAB's...