MacPhee v Peters Foods Australia Pty Limited (in liquidation) [2003] FCA 1528
The range boards distributed by Peters Foods depicting Drumstick Gold as 'Lemon Cheesecake' were misleading or deceptive and constituted false representation within s 52 and s 53 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), but the advertisement qualified with 'lemon cheesecake flavour' was not. No passing off was made out, as there was no misrepresentation connecting respondent’s goods to applicant. The applicant failed to prove any loss resulting from the misleading conduct and thus could not recover damages. On the cross claim, the registered design was an obvious adaptation of pre-existing cone-shaped articles (ice creams), was not novel, and was properly expunged from the register.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application and Cross Claim / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; cross claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'false Representation' 'passing Off' 'rectification of Register' 'design Registration' 'standing to Apply for Rectification']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application and Cross Claim / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the advertising placard describing respondent's ice cream as 'Lemon Cheesecake' was misleading or deceptive conduct under s 52/53 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)" 'Whether respondent passed off its ice cream product as goods of the applicant' "Whether applicant's registered design should be expunged from register under the Designs Act 1906 (Cth)"]
Ratio Decidendi
The range boards distributed by Peters Foods depicting Drumstick Gold as 'Lemon Cheesecake' were misleading or deceptive and constituted false representation within s 52 and s 53 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), but the advertisement qualified with 'lemon cheesecake flavour' was not. No passing off was made out, as there was no misrepresentation connecting respondent’s goods to applicant. The applicant failed to prove any loss resulting from the misleading conduct and thus could not recover damages. On the cross claim, the registered design was an obvious adaptation of pre-existing cone-shaped articles (ice creams), was not novel, and was properly expunged from the register.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; cross claim allowed
Orders
- ["Declaration that Peters Foods Australia Pty Limited (in liquidation) engaged in conduct in breach of s 52 and s 53 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by distributing range boards describing Drumstick Gold as 'Lemon Cheesecake' when it was not cheesecake." 'No order as to costs of the application.' 'Cross claim...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment