Moss v Lowe Hunt & Partners Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1181
The respondents, by making misleading representations regarding the financial position of Lowe Hunt and failing to disclose material financial weaknesses to Mr Moss, induced him to leave his own business and accept employment. This contravened ss 52, 53B TPA and ss 42, 46 FTA, causing Pegasus to lose a valuable commercial opportunity. Damages are payable for this lost opportunity, assessed as the difference between projected earnings from continued consultancy and actual earnings during employment, discounted appropriately for contingencies.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the second applicant (Pegasus Strategic Planning Pty Ltd)
- Legal Topics
- ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'statutory Compensation' 'assessment of Damages' 'employment Representations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether representations made by employer to prospective employee were misleading or deceptive or liable to mislead or deceive under Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)' 'Whether failure to disclose financial state constituted misleading conduct' 'Whether damages for lost business opportunity are actionable under s 82 TPA/s 68 FTA' 'Assessment of damages based on hypothetical state if applicant had continued consultancy business']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents, by making misleading representations regarding the financial position of Lowe Hunt and failing to disclose material financial weaknesses to Mr Moss, induced him to leave his own business and accept employment. This contravened ss 52, 53B TPA and ss 42, 46 FTA, causing Pegasus to lose a valuable commercial opportunity. Damages are payable for this lost opportunity, assessed as the difference between projected earnings from continued consultancy and actual earnings during employment, discounted appropriately for contingencies.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the second applicant (Pegasus Strategic Planning Pty Ltd)
Orders
- ['Judgment in favour of the second applicant in the sum of $306,740.' 'Costs are reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment