Batten v CTMS Ltd [1999] FCA 1576

Batten v CTMS Ltd [1999] FCA 1576

The Minister is immune from liability under the Trade Practices Act 1974 due to Crown immunity and insufficient pleaded involvement in contraventions; pleadings are defective for failure to particularise loss and damage and to sufficiently identify the basis for extended liability, justifying dismissal and strike-out orders in part, with amendments required for other aspects.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 November 1999
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory (pleadings Strike Out/dismissal, Costs, Directions)
Outcome
Proceedings against the Commonwealth of Australia and Peter Keaston Reith dismissed with costs (including partial indemnity costs); pleadings partially struck out; applicants given leave to replead with particulars for certain paragraphs; directions given for amendment; costs for certain respondents to be taxed and...
Legal Topics
['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'strike Out Applications' 'representative Proceedings' 'crown Immunity' 'damages – Loss and Damage' 'duty of Care – Economic Loss' 'costs – Indemnity Costs']
['trade Practices' 'negligence' 'employment Law' 'pleadings/procedure'] ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'strike Out Applications' 'representative Proceedings' 'crown Immunity' 'damages – Loss and Damage' 'duty of Care – Economic Loss' 'costs – Indemnity Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application / Interlocutory (pleadings Strike Out/dismissal, Costs, Directions)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether proceedings should be dismissed or pleadings struck out for failure to disclose a reasonable cause of action or to particularise loss and damage for different group members' 'Whether Crown immunity under the Trade Practices Act 1974 applies to the Minister and precludes liability under s 75B for involvement in alleged misrepresentations' 'Whether factual allegations support causes of action in negligence or for misleading and deceptive conduct under the TPA against the Minister and company directors' 'Whether the pleadings sufficiently identify the parties and individual loss and damage to group members']

Ratio Decidendi

The Minister is immune from liability under the Trade Practices Act 1974 due to Crown immunity and insufficient pleaded involvement in contraventions; pleadings are defective for failure to particularise loss and damage and to sufficiently identify the basis for extended liability, justifying dismissal and strike-out orders in part, with amendments required for other aspects.

Court Disposition

Proceedings against the Commonwealth of Australia and Peter Keaston Reith dismissed with costs (including partial indemnity costs); pleadings partially struck out; applicants given leave to replead with particulars for certain paragraphs; directions given for amendment; costs for certain respondents to be taxed and...

Orders

  • ['The proceedings against the thirty-fourth and thirty-fifth respondents be dismissed with costs and one-quarter of those costs to be taxed on an indemnity basis.' "References to 'the NFF interests' are struck out, with leave to replead identifying the relevant respondent(s)." 'Paragraph 70(viii) and the claim for...