Bond v Barry [2007] FCA 2034
Given the statutory complexity and potential for injustice if the decision below was incorrect, leave to appeal was granted due to sufficient doubt attending the construction of s 65A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) regarding the application of the media exemption to freelance journalists’ submissions to media organisations.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Judgment of Dismissal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'media Exemption' 'construction of Statutes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Judgment of Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to appeal the interlocutory dismissal under s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)' "Whether supply of article by freelance journalist to newspaper is a 'publication' under s 65A of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)" "Whether such publication is 'in connection with' the supply of goods or services under s 65A(1)(a)(i) and (vi)"]
Ratio Decidendi
Given the statutory complexity and potential for injustice if the decision below was incorrect, leave to appeal was granted due to sufficient doubt attending the construction of s 65A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) regarding the application of the media exemption to freelance journalists’ submissions to media organisations.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted
Orders
- ['Applicants have leave within 7 days to appeal from the interlocutory judgment of French J delivered on 21 September 2007 on the grounds set out in the Amended Draft Notice of Appeal.' 'Costs be costs in the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment