Acohs Pty Ltd v R A Bashford Consulting Pty Ltd & Ors [1997] FCA 352

Acohs Pty Ltd v R A Bashford Consulting Pty Ltd & Ors [1997] FCA 352

The Court found that the publication of a false copyright claim by RMS and RMC, for which Bialkower was involved, was misleading and deceptive conduct in contravention of s.52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth). Although Acohs failed to prove loss of contracts from the publication, the misleading publication damaged its business reputation and goodwill, warranting damages of $20,000. On the copyright cross-claim, the Court accepted that an implied licence by law extended to the copying, reproduction, and adaptation of Chemwatch MSDSs for safety-related purposes, including the electronic database uses by Acohs, so there was no infringement. Relief for copyright, even if infringement had...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 May 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Applicant (Acohs) succeeds on misleading conduct claim with damages; cross-claim for copyright infringement dismissed; orders for contribution and costs made as between the parties.
Legal Topics
['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'implied Licence in Copyright' 'material Safety Data Sheets (msds)' 'public Interest Defence in Copyright' 'damages for Loss of Goodwill']
['trade Practices' 'copyright Law'] ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'implied Licence in Copyright' 'material Safety Data Sheets (msds)' 'public Interest Defence in Copyright' 'damages for Loss of Goodwill']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the publication of a false copyright claim breached s.52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)' 'Whether Bialkower was involved in such breach' 'Whether Acohs suffered compensable loss for harm to reputation and goodwill' 'Whether MSDSs are original literary works protected by copyright' 'Whether an implied licence permits certain uses of MSDSs, including electronic adaptation' 'Whether the public interest or fair dealing defence applied to the copyright claim' 'Appropriate remedies and allocation of costs']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the publication of a false copyright claim by RMS and RMC, for which Bialkower was involved, was misleading and deceptive conduct in contravention of s.52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth). Although Acohs failed to prove loss of contracts from the publication, the misleading publication damaged its business reputation and goodwill, warranting damages of $20,000. On the copyright cross-claim, the Court accepted that an implied licence by law extended to the copying, reproduction, and adaptation of Chemwatch MSDSs for safety-related purposes, including the electronic database uses by Acohs, so there was no infringement. Relief for copyright, even if infringement had...

Court Disposition

Applicant (Acohs) succeeds on misleading conduct claim with damages; cross-claim for copyright infringement dismissed; orders for contribution and costs made as between the parties.

Orders

  • ['Declaration that RMS and RMC contravened s.52 TPA and Bialkower was involved in the contravention' 'Respondents to pay damages of $20,000 to Acohs' 'Application otherwise dismissed' 'Cross-claim by Bialkower dismissed' 'Declaration: RMS and RMC entitled to 75% contribution/indemnity from Bialkower for damages and...