Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Haddad [2015] NSWCA 186

Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Haddad [2015] NSWCA 186

Allianz did not breach the contract as no cancellation was communicated or outwardly acted upon; there was no misleading or deceptive conduct as Allianz's omissions did not amount to representational conduct or give rise to a reasonable expectation of renewal, and the statutory policy arising from s 58 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) expired before the insured event occurred.

Parties
Appellant/cross Respondent: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited; Respondent/cross Appellant: Sally Haddad
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal From District Court of New South Wales Judgment (civil)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment for appellant; cross-appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Insurance Contract Renewal, Statutory Insurance Policy, Cancellation of Insurance, Australian Consumer Law, ASIC Act, Section 58 Insurance Contracts Act
Insurance Law Consumer Law Misleading or Deceptive Conduct Insurance Contract Renewal Statutory Insurance Policy Cancellation of Insurance Australian Consumer Law ASIC Act +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Allianz Australia Insurance Limited

Appellant/cross Respondent

Sally Haddad

Respondent/cross Appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal From District Court of New South Wales Judgment (civil)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Allianz breached the 2008-2009 insurance contract
  2. 2 Whether Allianz engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct regarding renewal of the policy
  3. 3 Whether a statutory policy arose under s 58 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) and whether it covered the loss

Ratio Decidendi

Allianz did not breach the contract as no cancellation was communicated or outwardly acted upon; there was no misleading or deceptive conduct as Allianz's omissions did not amount to representational conduct or give rise to a reasonable expectation of renewal, and the statutory policy arising from s 58 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) expired before the insured event occurred.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment for appellant; cross-appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Grant leave to appeal from the judgment of the District Court ordered on 13 May 2014.
  • Grant leave to the appellant to file an amended Notice of Appeal which includes as a ground that the primary judge erred in finding that it had breached the 2008-2009 policy.