In the matter of Centro Retail Limited and Centro MCS Manager Limited in its capacity as Responsible Entity of Centro Retail Trust [2011] NSWSC 1175
The proposed modification allowing a single issue of Centro Retail Trust units at the Aggregation Issue Price did not affect members' rights within s 601GC(1)(b), because members had no relevant right to insist that the scheme continue to be administered under the existing issue-price provisions or that their proportionate economic participation remain undiluted. The responsible entity had actually and reasonably formed the view that members' rights would not be adversely affected. As trustee, it also considered benefit to beneficiaries on relevant material, including expert opinions that the aggregation transaction would increase value and that benefits clearly outweighed disadvantages,...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 for Judicial Advice; Equity Division Corporations List / Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- Judicial advice granted that the applicant would be justified in modifying the constitution of the Centro Retail Trust under s 601GC(1)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Constitution of Registered Scheme Under S 601 Gc(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth)' "meaning of Members' Rights" 'responsible Entity Duties as Trustee' 'issue Price for Units' 'judicial Advice Under S 63 of the Trustee Act 1925']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 for Judicial Advice; Equity Division Corporations List / Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the responsible entity of the Centro Retail Trust would be justified in modifying the constitution under s 601GC(1)(b) without a special resolution of members.' "Whether the proposed modification allowing a single issue of units at the Aggregation Issue Price would affect or adversely affect members' rights." "Whether members' rights include a right to have the scheme administered according to the existing constitution and not otherwise." 'Whether the responsible entity, as trustee, had to consider whether exercise of the modification power would benefit beneficiaries, including the possibility of dilution.' 'Whether earlier announcements proposing use of s 601GC(1)(a) impeded later reliance on s 601GC(1)(b).']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed modification allowing a single issue of Centro Retail Trust units at the Aggregation Issue Price did not affect members' rights within s 601GC(1)(b), because members had no relevant right to insist that the scheme continue to be administered under the existing issue-price provisions or that their proportionate economic participation remain undiluted. The responsible entity had actually and reasonably formed the view that members' rights would not be adversely affected. As trustee, it also considered benefit to beneficiaries on relevant material, including expert opinions that the aggregation transaction would increase value and that benefits clearly outweighed disadvantages,...
Court Disposition
Judicial advice granted that the applicant would be justified in modifying the constitution of the Centro Retail Trust under s 601GC(1)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Orders
- ['Judicial advice that the applicant, as responsible entity of the Centro Retail Trust, would be justified in modifying the constitution of the Centro Retail Trust under s 601GC(1)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in accordance with the proposed amending deed at tab 5 of exhibit MDB1 to the second affidavit of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment