Giannaki v Waverley Council [2010] NSWLEC 191
Leave was granted because, although the objectors had a good opportunity to put their case to the council and the appeal matters did not go beyond matters raised before the council, there was a serious question about whether the council officers adequately considered the objectors' geotechnical evidence and a serious question that the additional excavation could significantly affect the stability of the residential building on the objectors' adjoining property.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Proceedings; Application by Objectors for Leave to Appeal Against a Modification Determination Under S 96 Aa(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Ex Tempore Judgment on Leave Application
- Outcome
- Leave granted to the objectors to appeal against the modification determination.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'objector Leave to Appeal' 'additional Excavation' 'stability of Adjoining Residential Building']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Proceedings; Application by Objectors for Leave to Appeal Against a Modification Determination Under S 96 Aa(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Ex Tempore Judgment on Leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the objectors' leave application should be determined immediately or with the hearing of the appeal." "Whether leave should be granted under s 96AA(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to appeal against Waverley Council's determination modifying development consent DA 201/2007." 'Whether the proposed appeal raised matters going beyond those put to the council or sought to challenge the original consent.' "Whether there was a serious question about the adequacy of the council's consideration of geotechnical evidence and the potential impact of the modification on the objectors' property."]
Ratio Decidendi
Leave was granted because, although the objectors had a good opportunity to put their case to the council and the appeal matters did not go beyond matters raised before the council, there was a serious question about whether the council officers adequately considered the objectors' geotechnical evidence and a serious question that the additional excavation could significantly affect the stability of the residential building on the objectors' adjoining property.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to the objectors to appeal against the modification determination.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to the objectors to appeal against the modification determination.' "The parties' legal representatives are to confer within the next 24 hours and endeavour to agree on pre-trial directions." 'The matter is listed before the Registrar on Friday 1 October 2010 for the purpose of giving directions...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment