REGINA v. SCHUBERT [2000] NSWSC 1127
The deceased was an intruder within the Home Invasion (Occupants Protection) Act 1998 and the accused was an occupant. In light of the violent home invasion, the assaults on the accused and her fiance, the accused's intellectual impairment and perceptions, and the unreliability of key Crown witnesses on contested matters, the Court was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt either that the accused had the requisite intent for murder or that the Crown had rebutted self-defence or the statutory immunity. The accused was therefore not guilty of murder or manslaughter.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial for Murder / Judge Alone Trial; Verdict and Judgment of Acquittal
- Outcome
- Not guilty of murder and not guilty of manslaughter; judgment of acquittal entered.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'manslaughter' 'self Defence' 'defence of Others' 'home Invasion' 'intent' 'burden and Standard of Proof' 'judge Alone Trial' 'reasons for Acquittal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial for Murder / Judge Alone Trial; Verdict and Judgment of Acquittal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Crown proved beyond reasonable doubt the elements of murder, including the requisite intent.' "Whether the Crown proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's act causing death was not done in self-defence or defence of another." 'Whether the Home Invasion (Occupants Protection) Act 1998 applied to confer immunity from criminal liability.' 'Whether it was necessary to consider provocation or manslaughter if self-defence or statutory immunity was not rebutted.' 'What reasons should be given on an acquittal in a judge-alone criminal trial.']
Ratio Decidendi
The deceased was an intruder within the Home Invasion (Occupants Protection) Act 1998 and the accused was an occupant. In light of the violent home invasion, the assaults on the accused and her fiance, the accused's intellectual impairment and perceptions, and the unreliability of key Crown witnesses on contested matters, the Court was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt either that the accused had the requisite intent for murder or that the Crown had rebutted self-defence or the statutory immunity. The accused was therefore not guilty of murder or manslaughter.
Court Disposition
Not guilty of murder and not guilty of manslaughter; judgment of acquittal entered.
Orders
- ['Verdict of not guilty on the charge of murder.' 'Verdict of not guilty on the charge of manslaughter.' 'Judgment of acquittal entered.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment