R v Carbone [2016] NSWSC 1591
The requirements of s 65(2)(d) of the Evidence Act are not satisfied as the statement was not shown to be likely reliable in the circumstances it was made, and even if those requirements were satisfied, the unfair prejudice to the accused in admitting the untested statement would outweigh its probative value.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Application to admit the statement of Kale Turner refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'hearsay Evidence' 'admissibility of Statements' 'unavailability of Witness' 'section 65 Evidence Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the hearsay statement of Kale Turner is admissible under s 65(2)(d) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)' 'Whether all reasonable steps were taken to establish the unavailability of the witness' 'Whether the representation was made in circumstances likely to ensure its reliability' 'Whether unfair prejudice outweighs probative value']
Ratio Decidendi
The requirements of s 65(2)(d) of the Evidence Act are not satisfied as the statement was not shown to be likely reliable in the circumstances it was made, and even if those requirements were satisfied, the unfair prejudice to the accused in admitting the untested statement would outweigh its probative value.
Court Disposition
Application to admit the statement of Kale Turner refused.
Orders
- ['Refuse the application under s 65 Evidence Act to admit the statement of Kale Turner dated 25 May 2015.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment