R v Wilson (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1684

R v Wilson (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1684

On the limited evidence available, including the evidence of Krystelle Collins and Aaron Kirchner and the forensic evidence, the Court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the accused deliberately shot Scott Daniel Bryan and did so with an intention to kill. The Court was also satisfied on the balance of probabilities that, when writing the letters underlying counts 2 and 3, the accused was suffering from a disease of the mind causing such a defect of reason that he knew neither the nature and quality of his actions nor that what he was doing was wrong. A sentence of imprisonment would have been imposed for murder at a normal trial, but the accused's serious mental condition...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Special Hearing Under the Mental Health (forensic Provisions) Act 1990 / Principal Judgment Following Finding of Unfitness to Be Tried
Outcome
The accused was found, on the limited evidence available, to have committed murder; he was found not guilty by reason of mental illness on counts 2 and 3; an 18-year limiting term was nominated and detention ordered.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'special Hearing' 'unfitness to Be Tried' 'defence of Mental Illness' 'limiting Term' 'solicit to Murder' 'act Intended to Cause False Evidence']
['criminal Law' 'mental Health and Forensic Procedure' 'sentencing'] ['murder' 'special Hearing' 'unfitness to Be Tried' 'defence of Mental Illness' 'limiting Term' 'solicit to Murder' 'act Intended to Cause False Evidence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Special Hearing Under the Mental Health (forensic Provisions) Act 1990 / Principal Judgment Following Finding of Unfitness to Be Tried

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether, on the limited evidence available at a special hearing, Joseph Rowan Wilson committed the murder of Scott Daniel Bryan.' 'Whether the accused was not guilty by reason of mental illness of soliciting Gerard Michael Wilson to murder Krystelle Lee Collins.' 'Whether the accused was not guilty by reason of mental illness of committing an act intended to cause Krystelle Lee Collins to give false evidence.' 'Whether a sentence of imprisonment would have been imposed if the special hearing had been a normal trial, and what limiting term should be nominated.' "Whether the accused's mental condition was relevant to the length of the limiting term."]

Ratio Decidendi

On the limited evidence available, including the evidence of Krystelle Collins and Aaron Kirchner and the forensic evidence, the Court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the accused deliberately shot Scott Daniel Bryan and did so with an intention to kill. The Court was also satisfied on the balance of probabilities that, when writing the letters underlying counts 2 and 3, the accused was suffering from a disease of the mind causing such a defect of reason that he knew neither the nature and quality of his actions nor that what he was doing was wrong. A sentence of imprisonment would have been imposed for murder at a normal trial, but the accused's serious mental condition...

Court Disposition

The accused was found, on the limited evidence available, to have committed murder; he was found not guilty by reason of mental illness on counts 2 and 3; an 18-year limiting term was nominated and detention ordered.

Orders

  • ['I find upon the limited evidence available that the accused Joseph Rowan Wilson committed the offence of the murder of Scott Daniel Bryan on 24 November 2008.' 'I indicate that if the special hearing involving the accused had been a normal trial against a person fit to be tried, I would have imposed a sentence of...