R v NB [2022] NSWSC 151

R v NB [2022] NSWSC 151

The court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that, after the deceased returned to the accused's home on 22/23 March 2015, he sustained severe non-accidental injuries including a fatal stomach perforation, a fractured femur, and facial and other injuries. The court rejected the accused's explanations and found no reasonable hypothesis that the injuries were accidental, self-inflicted, caused during resuscitation, or inflicted by another person. The force required, particularly to perforate the stomach and fracture the femur of a 20-month-old child, supported the only rational inference that the accused violently assaulted the deceased with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, thereby...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 February 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution for Murder / Judge Alone Trial Verdict
Outcome
The accused was found guilty of murder and convicted.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'death of a Child' 'circumstantial Evidence' 'expert Opinion Evidence' 'judge Alone Trial' 'manslaughter by Unlawful and Dangerous Act' 'manslaughter by Criminal Negligence' 'delay and Forensic Disadvantage' 'consciousness of Guilt']
['criminal Law' 'evidence' 'criminal Procedure'] ['murder' 'death of a Child' 'circumstantial Evidence' 'expert Opinion Evidence' 'judge Alone Trial' 'manslaughter by Unlawful and Dangerous Act' 'manslaughter by Criminal Negligence' 'delay and Forensic Disadvantage' 'consciousness of Guilt']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution for Murder / Judge Alone Trial Verdict

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Crown proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed a voluntary act causing the deceased's death with intent to inflict grievous bodily harm." "Whether the deceased's stomach perforation occurred after the deceased returned to the accused's home on 22 March 2015 and was caused by the accused." "Whether the deceased's injuries were accidental, self-inflicted, inflicted by another person, or caused during resuscitation." 'Whether, if murder was not proved, manslaughter by unlawful and dangerous act or manslaughter by criminal negligence was established.' "How the court should evaluate a circumstantial case, expert medical evidence, the accused's statements to police, consciousness of guilt, and forensic disadvantage from delay."]

Ratio Decidendi

The court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that, after the deceased returned to the accused's home on 22/23 March 2015, he sustained severe non-accidental injuries including a fatal stomach perforation, a fractured femur, and facial and other injuries. The court rejected the accused's explanations and found no reasonable hypothesis that the injuries were accidental, self-inflicted, caused during resuscitation, or inflicted by another person. The force required, particularly to perforate the stomach and fracture the femur of a 20-month-old child, supported the only rational inference that the accused violently assaulted the deceased with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, thereby...

Court Disposition

The accused was found guilty of murder and convicted.

Orders

  • ['The accused is guilty of murder.' '[Name redacted], you are convicted of the murder [Name redacted].']