R v Moyano (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1485
The evidence proved beyond reasonable doubt that Mr Moyano killed Keith Lee by repeatedly stabbing him with a knife. The psychiatric evidence established on the balance of probabilities that, at the time, Mr Moyano suffered chronic schizophrenia or a major mental illness which deprived him of the ability to know that what he was doing was wrong in the relevant moral sense. The defence of mental illness was therefore established and a special verdict of not guilty on the ground of mental illness was required. Because his ongoing illness posed considerable risks to the public and the Court could not be satisfied that release would not seriously endanger public safety, a detention order...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Special Hearing on Charge of Murder / Special Hearing Before a Judge Sitting Alone After the Accused Was Found Unfit to Be Tried
- Outcome
- Special verdict entered that Charles Robert Moyano is not guilty on the ground of mental illness; detention ordered until released by due process of law.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'special Hearing' 'defence of Mental Illness' 'not Guilty on the Ground of Mental Illness' 'detention of Forensic Patient']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Special Hearing on Charge of Murder / Special Hearing Before a Judge Sitting Alone After the Accused Was Found Unfit to Be Tried
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether, on the limited evidence available at a special hearing, the accused committed the acts causing Keith Lee's death." 'Whether the accused established the defence of mental illness on the balance of probabilities.' 'Whether an order for detention should be made under s 39 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence proved beyond reasonable doubt that Mr Moyano killed Keith Lee by repeatedly stabbing him with a knife. The psychiatric evidence established on the balance of probabilities that, at the time, Mr Moyano suffered chronic schizophrenia or a major mental illness which deprived him of the ability to know that what he was doing was wrong in the relevant moral sense. The defence of mental illness was therefore established and a special verdict of not guilty on the ground of mental illness was required. Because his ongoing illness posed considerable risks to the public and the Court could not be satisfied that release would not seriously endanger public safety, a detention order...
Court Disposition
Special verdict entered that Charles Robert Moyano is not guilty on the ground of mental illness; detention ordered until released by due process of law.
Orders
- ['Under s 38 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act, a special verdict is entered that Charles Robert Moyano is not guilty on the ground of mental illness.' 'Under s 39 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act, Mr Moyano is to be detained in a correctional facility or at such other place as determined...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment