R v Wills [2008] NSWSC 932
The Crown case, although suspicious, did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused perpetrated the attack. The judge would not act on Mark Skerry's unreliable evidence placing the accused with the deceased in the afternoon of 16 July, the accused's leg injury was supported by evidence that it pre-dated the possible attack, and the accused's explanation for the deceased's blood on his clothing could not be excluded as a reasonable possibility.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial by Judge Alone for Murder / Retrial; Reasons for Verdict
- Outcome
- Accused found not guilty.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'circumstantial Evidence' 'burden of Proof' 'trial by Judge Alone' 'retrial']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial by Judge Alone for Murder / Retrial; Reasons for Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Crown proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the perpetrator of the fatal assault on Hans Hoch.' "Whether the circumstances relied on by the Crown, including the deceased's blood on the accused's clothing, supported the inference of guilt beyond reasonable doubt."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown case, although suspicious, did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused perpetrated the attack. The judge would not act on Mark Skerry's unreliable evidence placing the accused with the deceased in the afternoon of 16 July, the accused's leg injury was supported by evidence that it pre-dated the possible attack, and the accused's explanation for the deceased's blood on his clothing could not be excluded as a reasonable possibility.
Court Disposition
Accused found not guilty.
Orders
- ['Verdict: not guilty']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment