R v Cyril Weazel [2014] NSWSC 1664
The Crown did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that any particular act or acts of the accused substantially contributed to the deceased's death. The deceased had sustained many blunt force injuries that could have resulted from repeated falls while severely intoxicated; the two most serious injuries were likely attributable respectively to repeated falls against the bed or wall and to CPR. Nor did the Crown prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused intended to really seriously injure the deceased. Accordingly murder was not established, and the alternative count of causing grievous bodily harm with intent also failed because causation of grievous bodily harm and intent were not proved.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Criminal Special Hearing / Special Hearing Before Judge Alone Following a Finding That the Accused Was Unfit to Be Tried
- Outcome
- The accused was found not guilty of both counts on the indictment.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'causing Grievous Bodily Harm With Intent' 'causation' 'intent' 'fitness to Be Tried' 'special Hearing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Criminal Special Hearing / Special Hearing Before Judge Alone Following a Finding That the Accused Was Unfit to Be Tried
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Crown proved beyond reasonable doubt that an act or acts of the accused substantially contributed to the death of Nancy Dynevor.' 'Whether the Crown proved beyond reasonable doubt that, at the time of inflicting any fatal injuries, the accused intended to cause really serious injury.' 'Whether the accused caused grievous bodily harm to Nancy Dynevor with intent to cause grievous bodily harm.' 'Whether the partial defence of substantial impairment would reduce murder to manslaughter if murder were otherwise established.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that any particular act or acts of the accused substantially contributed to the deceased's death. The deceased had sustained many blunt force injuries that could have resulted from repeated falls while severely intoxicated; the two most serious injuries were likely attributable respectively to repeated falls against the bed or wall and to CPR. Nor did the Crown prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused intended to really seriously injure the deceased. Accordingly murder was not established, and the alternative count of causing grievous bodily harm with intent also failed because causation of grievous bodily harm and intent were not proved.
Court Disposition
The accused was found not guilty of both counts on the indictment.
Orders
- ['The accused is not guilty of murder.' 'The accused is not guilty of causing grievous bodily harm with intent to cause grievous bodily harm.' 'Pursuant to s 26 of the Mental Health (Forensic Procedures) Act 1990, the accused is to be dealt with as if he had been found not guilty at a normal trial in relation to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment