R v Shepherd [2006] NSWSC 799
The offence was murder but was not in the worst category and was below the midrange of objective seriousness for murder. The attack was not premeditated, the weapons were opportunistic, alcohol played a significant part, and the Crown had not proved beyond reasonable doubt an intent to kill rather than an intent to inflict grievous bodily harm. Although the offence involved a weapon and great violence, the offender had previous good character, low risk of re-offending, very good prospects of rehabilitation and a measure of remorse. The 20-year standard non-parole period was therefore not applied, but remained an important guidepost, requiring a lengthy sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence for Murder / Remarks on Sentence After Jury Verdict of Guilty
- Outcome
- Sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 15 years and a balance of term of 5 years.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'domestic Murder' 'intoxication' 'victim Impact Statements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Murder / Remarks on Sentence After Jury Verdict of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What sentence should be imposed for the offender's murder of Gabrielle Best." 'Whether the offence fell within the worst category of murder attracting life imprisonment.' 'Whether the standard non-parole period of 20 years for murder should apply.' 'Whether the offender intended to kill or intended to inflict grievous bodily harm.' 'What aggravating and mitigating factors under s21A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 affected sentence.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offence was murder but was not in the worst category and was below the midrange of objective seriousness for murder. The attack was not premeditated, the weapons were opportunistic, alcohol played a significant part, and the Crown had not proved beyond reasonable doubt an intent to kill rather than an intent to inflict grievous bodily harm. Although the offence involved a weapon and great violence, the offender had previous good character, low risk of re-offending, very good prospects of rehabilitation and a measure of remorse. The 20-year standard non-parole period was therefore not applied, but remained an important guidepost, requiring a lengthy sentence.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 15 years and a balance of term of 5 years.
Orders
- ['In relation to the murder of Gabrielle Best, the offender is sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 15 years to commence on 23 November 2003 and to expire on 22 November 2018.' 'The balance of term is 5 years to expire on 22 November 2023.' 'The offender will be eligible for parole on 22 November...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment